They refused to provide me any information on a mortgage I assumed by simple assumption through my boyfriend in 2004. When my boyfriend decides to break it off he put a pin number on the account and told them to tell me nothing. Through an entire Partition action, me as the defendant, they refused to acknowledge whether or not I was a party to the loan. However, in interrogatories they simply said I did not execute the note or deed but w/o waving objection. During the trial the Plaintiff attorney suggested that WFHM told him that they had "taken the position that I was not a party to the note". The defendent WFHM was not in the court room, there or during my oral argument at my appeal hearing pro se. The plaintiff ignored a court order to sell property on court house steps through assigned commissioner. Instead, this suddenly pro se 57 year old property owner had her weatherby lake property worth $400,000 stolen by plaintiff in a garnishment of my interests therein for a whopping $500. I kid you not! They didn't have a lien by another judgment. The didn't serve me on the Sheriff's Sale of my property. There's so many Rules and Statutes that was ignored. All the while WFHM stayed incognito and much as possible. Fanny Mae would not even allow this simple assumption now.