anonymous
12 years ago
1. New or Used house?
2. Small or big house?
3. 15 or 30 year loan?
I live in SLC, UT if that means anything.
When it comes down to buying a new house or used house I think they're even. If anything I'd might get a newer house. I read on some new rule starting in 2009 that they require the houses to be so efficient, so I think the oldest house I'd buy is 2009. With older houses you'll have smaller closets (could care less) and newer houses usually have the kitchen connected with the family room (to make it feel more open, since we spend the most time in the kitchen area). I'd honestly buy a new house with an unfinished basement. I'd tell myself I would finish the basement myself because I like working with my hands, but I dunno
.
The real question is big house, or small house. closing fees in Salt Lake City are around 2-4%, thats the only expense from selling a house to buy a different one right? Meaning a small house makes sense as long as the savings exceeds the 4% closing cost on your future bigger house.
4% * 300,000 = $12,000 (this would be the closing cost for a new house)
Looking around the internet I found these guestimates...
.55% homeowners insurance
3.5% 30 year loan (or 2.6% for a 15 year loan)
1% property tax
and like 500 dollar mortgage insurance a year, or something like that.
so basically 5%.
so small house that cost 200,000 *.05 = $10,000 year compared to 300,000 * .05 = $15,000... Meaning you're saving $5,000 to live in a smaller house. This doesn't include utilities, but houses are so efficient you'll save what, $25 a month from a big house to a small house?
So buying a small house will pay for the cost of closing fees on your future bigger house in (12000/5000) = 2.4 years. After that you're paying yourself $5,000 to live in a smaller house.
Lets pretend that small and big houses appreciate at the same rate. The big house obviously makes more money (or loses more money) since it cost more. Obviously. Heres a cool site that shows the average appreciation rate for houses depending on location
http://www.neighborhoodscout.com/ut/farmington/shepard-ln/#rates
farmington had 3 different locations, all with different rates, I chose the smallest one which is 4.7% (being conservative, which I still think 4.7% seems too high). If you think about it you pay 5% in insurance and other expenses while your house appreciates 4.7%, meaning you almost break even. Wouldn't say houses are investments, but a good way to.. save and sit on your money.
$200,000 dollar house in 15 years will be worth $398318,
$300,000 dollar house in 15 years will be worth $597477
The $5,000 would increase as the house increase. meaning you'd pay 105,488 in 15 years. Still showing the bigger house wins at $93671...
5000 is the difference between the 2. Since estimated appreciation is 4.7 and expense is 5% youre technically losing .3%. The 200,000 house youd lose 8813 total. Long story short i think youre appreciation of your house will break even with your expense of the house with a 30 year loan at 3.5...
With the 300,000 house youd lose 13220. Meaning it would cost you that much to live. The rest of the your money all youre doing is tucking it into a house.
So if you did a 15 year loan youd make .6 percent. Making 18,000 on a 200,000 house. If you sold after the 15 years (house is now worth 392650) 392650 * 6 percent for sellers agent is 23559. Youd lose money buying a small house on a 15 year loan and then selling to upgrade.
I guess with the small house problem i only calculated your position in the first 15 years. Once your house is paid off youre making 2.5 percent more. So 2.9 percent for 15 years is .... My brain is fried. an extra $213272 profit. But a dollar today is worth more than a dollar tomorrow, did I calculate the time value of money? FML
So basically, is it financially smarter to buy new or used? small or big (I plan to have a fairly large family so I know if I bought I small house I'd end up in a big house in 15ish years)? 15 year or 30 year loan?